Digital sovereignty is no longer an abstract policy concept. It has become a defining issue of our time.
At Davos and across global leadership circles, the debate has shifted. No one is asking whether digital sovereignty matters anymore. That question is settled. The real concern now is how quickly nations can establish sovereignty over their AI, data, and cloud infrastructure—and what the consequences are for those that fail to act.
AI has moved from experimentation to production. Data has become leverage. Cloud infrastructure is now strategic national infrastructure. In that context, dependence on foreign platforms, laws, and geopolitical realities is no longer a theoretical risk—it’s an operational one.
In this episode of Shimmy Says, Shimmy explores why digital sovereignty has become inseparable from national sovereignty. Governments are rethinking hyperscaler dependency, supply chain exposure, and the jurisdictional control of critical digital assets. These moves are driven by resilience, security, and survival—not ideology.
But that’s only half the story.
As nations race to secure their digital futures, individuals increasingly find their own digital autonomy at risk. Surveillance, opaque platforms, and algorithmic decision-making are becoming default conditions of modern digital life. Consent is often assumed. Control is often absent.
Digital sovereignty cannot stop at borders.
Every individual deserves meaningful control over their data, privacy, and digital identity. Choosing to trade some of that control for convenience should remain a personal decision—not one imposed by governments, platforms, or algorithms.
In a fragmented digital world, sovereignty must exist at both levels.
Digital sovereignty is national sovereignty.
And just as importantly, digital sovereignty is personal sovereignty.
That’s what Shimmy says.